Review of the Principal Ordinance
It is now amended mainly in practice and its administration regarding conferring. It goes considerably beyond the
Adi as in J. Junich {ke - to Mukhing offenders under (for indict the offences, other than homicide, this summarily), but this is probably all dealt with by the new districts Act which is not before. It is extraordinary, inconceivable that so much time should lapse before we are put in possession of the statistics of the preceding year. I have called attention to this before.
A senior thinker from the Drafting Committee that the limitation of this section to the schedule has been carefully settled, but I am not surprised if they have overlooked some other misdemeanour for which the stocks are hardly an appropriate punishment. However, they can always amend by adding to the schedule.
The provisions do not appear to call for comment from A to $4.
The best point of training we may have an uneasy feeling that the Magistrates will give effect to the punishment on in ten times able of we shall be.
LIR. Check this is the periodical returns. 25/4
Wait a reasonable time for the spitting protest. Chang Seely Is proceeding. It's not much like the effect & number of lashes of whipping, at the end of a year when we do. Do Mike Mr. Risley.
I am not quite clear whether the effect of section 6 (Stocks) is to increase the use of this punishment or diminish it. Can you advise?
Order 13 of 1907 (4043567 and pp. herewith) was passed in order to limit to "offences punishable with imprisonment only" the which use of the stocks as a punishment allowed by sec 87 of the Magistrates Ordinance 1900.
The Draftsman, however, overlooked sec 80 of the then Ordinance of which is magistrates' alternative powers of fine or imprisonment in the case of offences with which they are empowered to deal summarily. They cannot so deal with indictable offences of the grave sort - such Schedule 3 sa of the order.
Consequently, as pointed out in the Annex [Debates p.154] to a large extent the intention of Order 13 of 1907 was defeated, for it would seem that the stocks could be resorted to only in cases of non-indictable offences punishable with imprisonment only, and I should imagine that such offences are few in number.
Sec 5 of the present order is meant to give effect to the real intention of Order 13 of 1907. It is of course subject to sec 80 of the Magistrates Ordinance, and in laying down that the stocks sanction the tie.
28/4
Page information is not explicitly present in the original text; however, based on the content and the instruction to keep 'Page XX' information, it is assumed that the original text was not provided with clear page breaks. The text has been formatted into paragraphs using HTML as per the instructions.
Ixo of the Principat ada
avery tannies
Ste 5.
and now amanded mangy I mad therefore
Cut Gewohnt in practice and its administration regains contering. trinità it goes considerably beyond the
[
Adi as
in. J. Junich
{ke -
to Mukhing offenders under (for indict the offences, other than homicide, this summariel), but this is probably all allind by the new distruns Act which is not before It is extraordinaisle, incoronant that so much
time she lapse bifor us are fut in porosion of
the startistes of the preceding year
called attention to this before.
A seu
-thuik ]
from the Dorbalis that the limitation of this section to the schedule has been carefully settled, but Ishs noth surprised if they have overlooked some other misdemeanolo
for rich the stocks an
hardly an appropriati frumhment. However, they can alway ament by addrway to the schwork.
The the provisie do not appear to cat. por
comment from
A to $4
beat point of train
we may an une
tot the Magistrates will fire effect oth
filment on in ten tim
able
of we shall be
LIR.
check this is the periodical relims.
25/4
Wait a reasonable time for the spitting protest.
ཆ་
to pay to far asing.
Chonge Seely
Is proced.
Its not much like the
efien.
song whipping
true
y
apk for a
in the effect & number oflares of
whipper, at the end of a year when we
Do do Mike
Mr. Risley.
ร
216
am not quite clear whethe.. the affect of section o (Stocks) is
increase the use of this punishment
or dimmish it. Can
on advise?
you
Js.
Coloud Srik
orda 13 of 1907 (4043567 and pp. herewith) was posord
in roders to limit to "offences punis a" with imprisonment
only" the wich use of the stocks as
a
punishment
allowed by ssc 87 of the Magistrati radu 1990.
the Dftsman, howives, overlooked sic 80 of the than Fading
of which is magistrates alternation ponivers
of five or imprisonment in the case
offences with chisch they
au
of all indictath
cnpowered to deal
Summa vile. I They cannot so deal with indictable
offences of the graves sort - su Sched 3
sa of
the orde].
Consequeath;
printed out "_ the Anly [Debatis p.154]
large extent
the intention of mide 13 of 1907 was to a
Defeated, for it would seem that the stocks could of non-indictath offences
to resorted to only in cases punishath with imprisonment only, and I shouts
invaeque that such offences
are
1
few in number.
Sre 5 of the present order is meant to give affect to the
real intention of order 13 of 1973
It is of course
ماندا سال
nde 13 of 1907
#
+
subject,
to 85C 80 of the Magpotratio
order rage, and in laging down that the stock.
sauction the tie.
AB
ite & Cocks as a
punishment. 28/4
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.